Digital Assets in the Inheritance Vortex: Testing the Readiness of Conventional Law and the Concept of Joint Property in Modern Families

  • Siti Murni STAI Tgk Chik Pante Kulu Banda Aceh
Keywords: Digital Assets, Inheritance, Conventional Law, Joint Property

Abstract

Conventional inheritance and marriage laws govern joint property. The legal status of these assets is unclear; whether they are inherited or joint property is difficult to determine. This type of research uses a normative legal research approach realized through the Library Research method. The data analysis technique that will be applied is qualitative content analysis, conducted interactively and continuously throughout the research process. The results of the study indicate that: 1). The Classification and Legal Status of Digital Assets in Inheritance and Joint Property is that digital assets can be classified into two main categories: assets with direct financial value (such as cryptocurrencies and e-wallets) and assets with indirect economic value (such as commercial social media accounts and NFTs). 2). Technical and Legal Challenges in Identifying, Proving, and Transferring Digital Assets are: First, identification challenges due to the virtual and hidden nature of digital assets often make heirs unaware of their existence. Second, problems proving ownership due to limited access to private keys, passwords, and platform policies that prohibit the transfer of ownership. Third, problems with the transfer of rights due to the absence of a clear legal mechanism for transferring ownership of digital assets to heirs, which has the potential to result in the assets being permanently lost. 3). Legal reconstruction and future solutions to fill regulatory gaps include: First, amending the Civil Code and the Marriage Law to explicitly recognize digital assets. Second, establishing specific regulations governing digital asset inheritance procedures and requiring digital platforms to provide inheritance protocols. Third, strengthening the role of notaries and educating the public about the importance of recording digital assets in wills, as well as developing a voluntary digital asset registration system.

References

Akhtam, Y. (2022). Doctrinal approaches and international experience in understanding the digital asset. The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology, 04(10), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume04issue10-05
Andaryanti, Y., Yuniarti, E., Erawati, W., Mashdurohatun, A., & Glaser, H. (2025). Addressing the legal gap in creditor safeguards for mortgage-backed loans. JoMW, 2025(1), 711-717. https://doi.org/10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.766
Aryani, K. (2023). The role of Islamic economic law in improving the welfare of MSMEs in Indonesia. ijlj, 1(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v1i2.2053
Basnan, N., Salleh, M., Ahmad, A., Harun, A., & Harun, A. (2013). Towards the implementation of accrual accounting in Malaysia: accounting and legal proposals for heritage assets. Ipn Journal of Research and Practice in Public Sector Accounting and Management, 3(01), 15-66. https://doi.org/10.58458/ipnj.v03.01.02.0027
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Gunawan, A. (2023). Inheritance Law in the Digital Era: Challenges and Opportunities . Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Hidayatullah, M. (2024). Legal knives and ballot boxes: an evaluative study of law enforcement in the 2024 elections. JIMR, 2(8), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr823
Moleong, LJ (2021). Qualitative Research Methodology (Revised Edition). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyani, S., Mariyam, S., & Hiếu, L. (2023). Legal construction of crypto assets as objects of fiduciary collateral. Law Reform, 19(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v19i1.52697
Putro, S. (2024). HR strategies to improve employee performance in the digital era. Productivity, 1(3), 402-420. https://doi.org/10.62207/fh29cd57
Ramadhan, N. and Wismanto, W. (2024). Understanding hawalah (theoretical and practical perspectives) in household relationships and religious court decisions regarding joint property containing hawalah. MJPM, 2(1), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v2i1.182
Salim, H. (2021). The Development of Property Law in the Indonesian Civil Law System . Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sidayang, S., Sumanta, M., Calya, C., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Addressing gender-based violence: comparative analysis of international legal frameworks and practices. The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v1i03.91
Sugiyono. (2021). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods (3rd Edition). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sutedi, A. (2022). Digital Law: Legal Transformation in the Technology Era . Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Tohari, C. (2018). Bilateral inheritance system reviewed from an Islamic legal perspective. Istinbath Journal of Law, 15(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.32332/istinbath.v15i1.1094
Umar, W. and Hikmawanti, A. (2023). Division of joint property from an Islamic legal perspective: Implementation of moral justice and social justice. Al-Ahkam Journal of Islamic Criminal Law, 5(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ahkam.v5i1.1724
Widjaja, J., Dakota, A., Ginting, Y., Valensia, V., Capello, J., Jauhanes, R., … & Dirgantara, B. (2024). Proof of corporate crime based on Semarang District Court decision number 16/pid.sus-tpk/2022/pn smg. Comserva Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(6), 1798-1808. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v4i6.2503
Željka, M. (2022). How 'digital' is the new Serbian law on digital assets?. Pravni Zapisi, 13(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-38132
Zhumataeva, M. (2024). Legal frameworks for the assessment of agricultural lands. Eurasian Science Review, 2(5), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-91
Zubkova, M. (2021). Digital financial assets and digital currency in the russian legal field.. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.04.02.179
Published
2025-10-14